Aside from the widespread misconception in legal practice that personal drug consumption is not punishable, many defendants are surprised when they are convicted. While consumption itself is not a crime, the necessary intermediate steps leading to consumption—such as possession and acquisition—are punishable offenses. The main legal issues surrounding narcotics in everyday practice include the concept of a “significant quantity” and drug trafficking.
Issue: The So-Called Non-Punishable Drug Consumption
Mere drug consumption is not punishable, regardless of the type of drug or how it is consumed. Since consumption itself is not explicitly regulated by law, no punishment can be imposed under the principle of “no punishment without law.”
However, many defendants overlook the fact that the Narcotics Act (BtMG) criminalizes almost every other interaction with narcotics—except consumption itself. Activities such as possession, acquisition, and even obtaining drugs in other ways are all punishable. Consequently, the legal space for non-punishable drug consumption is extremely limited.
To mitigate excessive criminal liability, lawmakers and courts have attempted to introduce exceptions:
- Possession may not be punishable if the drug is handed over in a consumable amount for immediate use.
- Drug traces found in blood or urine samples, as well as drug residues on paraphernalia (e.g., a hash pipe or syringe), do not constitute a criminal offense.
- When another person stores drugs in a shared home, a cohabitant is not necessarily in possession unless they actively exert control over the drugs.
- Destroying drugs or surrendering them to the police does not constitute possession.
Given the complexities of narcotics cases, legal counsel should carefully evaluate the accused’s statements and consider whether remaining silent is the best course of action.
Issue: The “Significant Quantity” Threshold
The BtMG does not define what constitutes a small, normal, or significant quantity of drugs. Instead, courts determine these thresholds based on scientific and judicial assessments of drug potency.
The Federal Court of Justice (BGH) has established the following limits for major narcotics:
| Heroin | 1.5 g Heroin Hydrochloride |
| Cocaine | 5 g Cocaine Hydrochloride |
| Cannabis | 7.5 g THC |
| Amphetamines | 10 g Amphetamine Base |
| Methamphetamine | 35 g M-Hydrochloride or 30 g M-Base |
| Ecstasy | 35 g MDE-Hydrochloride or 30 g MDMA-Base |
These calculations, however, do not reflect the realities of the drug trade, which operates based on weight rather than pure substance concentration. This can lead to inconsistencies in sentencing.
Issue: Drug Trafficking
The legal definition of drug trafficking is extremely broad and aims to criminalize any actions that facilitate the trade of narcotics. Courts interpret the term “trafficking” widely to cover:
- Any action intended to enable or promote drug distribution.
- Efforts to contact buyers or suppliers, even if no actual transaction occurs.
- Handling drugs for others, even as a one-time courier.
- Possession with intent to sell or distribute.
Even actions taken with no direct profit motive can be considered trafficking, provided they contribute to drug distribution. The presence of any personal benefit—whether financial, material, or immaterial—can establish liability.
Issue: Legal Aggregation of Transactions
Under the legal principle of “aggregation,” multiple drug-related actions can be legally combined into a single offense rather than being treated as separate crimes. This can lead to:
- Multiple sales being counted as one crime if they stem from the same drug supply.
- A single charge covering multiple transactions, which may increase the overall severity of sentencing.
- Defendants being unable to be re-tried for undiscovered drug quantities if they have already been convicted for part of the supply.
Issue: Criminal Intent
In criminal law, intent consists of knowledge and will. A person must be aware of their actions and intend to commit the crime. In drug cases:
- Knowledge of the drug’s identity and effects is required.
- Being unaware that a substance is a narcotic can be a defense.
- If a person mistakenly believes they are dealing with a different substance, intent may be questioned.
Sentencing often depends on whether the defendant knowingly handled drugs in significant quantities or for distribution.
Our law firm is dedicated to leveraging all legal options to develop strong defense strategies, focusing on judicial weaknesses.
The right attorney can make all the difference in criminal proceedings.
